Compare/ Contrast Essay
1. Broad Analytical Statement: Almost all successful classical civilizations needed a strong political base in order to thrive. 2. Thesis: Although both Han China and Gupta India’s political control directly correlated to religion, they differed in the centralization of their government, and what members of society became rulers. 3. a) Religion – Han China’s political system was directly influenced by Confucianism, and India’s political system correlated with Hinduism
b) Economic – China’s isolation led to them having a localized government. On the other hand, India was susceptible to outside forces and influences, causing it to have more diverse culture, and therefore to have local governments.
c) Social – The Hans’ rulers were educated bureaucrats who were members of the upper class, while India’s rulers were princes of the royal ruling family. Paragraph 2:
1. Topic – Han China and Mauryan/ Gupta India’s governments both connected to the civilizations’ religious views and practices. 2. Comparison - The Hans’ bureaucracy focused on Confucianism, promoting political virtue and societal order. In India, Hinduism played a major role in politics. 3. Evidence - . Rulers were seen as great superiors to whom people were to show great respect and obedience. The caste system very strictly divided people into social classes. Brahmins, religious priests were held highest in society. This determined who had power in politics. 4. Comparison - …
5. Evidence - …
1. Topic – The first noticeable difference between Han China and Classical India was the difference in the centralization of their governments. 2. Contrast – The Han were very isolated. India, however, was unlike China. … their government was localized, with differences from place to place. 3. Evidence – With little outside influence, their culture became very unified, leading to their economy and politics also being very unified. Their government was...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document